Pressure injuries (commonly called bedsores or pressure ulcers) represent one of the most persistent and costly challenges in healthcare, affecting over 2.5 million US patients and costing almost $27B in 2019. Hospital-acquired pressure injury events occur in about 3% in general populations and about 6% in intensive care units (ICUs). Current prevention strategies still rely on the Braden Scale risk assessment tool as the gold standard. Developed in the 80s, it is used to stratify patients into risk categories based on factors like sensory perception, moisture, mobility, and friction. The Braden score directly informs turning frequency as the standard of protocol. Unfortunately, medical staff adherence to turning protocols remains low at ~50% nationally, creating a gap between prescribed care and actual implementation. Technologies to help assess by sensing pressure injuries have limitations, including discontinuous monitoring requiring manual interpretation, and lack of objective mobility metrics. These fail to account for the complex interplay between pressure distribution, patient movement patterns, and individual risk factors. The Braden-scoring approach is particularly problematic as it does not account for the presence of existing pressure injuries or patient-specific factors, and has been shown to have inadequate validity for ICU patients. Additionally, current pressure mapping systems are typically large, expensive, and require specialized training, limiting their practical deployment in routine clinical care.